BLU C6L 2020 vs Nokia E52

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightE52: 69 g lighterE52: 98 g · C6L 2020: 167 g
• WidthE52: 25.7 mm narrowerE52: 49 mm · C6L 2020: 74.7 mm
• Screen diagonalE52: 3.3 in smaller diagonalE52: 2.4 in · C6L 2020: 5.7 in
• DepthE52: 1 mm thinnerE52: 9.9 mm · C6L 2020: 10.9 mm
• HeightE52: 39 mm shorterE52: 116 mm · C6L 2020: 155 mm
• Release year2020 / 2009C6L 2020: 2020 · E52: 2009

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. C6L 2020

   Height

   155 mm+39 mm versus E52

   Width

   74.7 mm+25.7 mm versus E52

   Depth

   10.9 mm+1 mm versus E52

   Weight

   167 g

2. 2. E52

   Height

   116 mm

   Width

   49 mm

   Depth

   9.9 mm

   Weight

   98 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. C6L 2020 5.7 in · 18:9 About 83.8 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. E52 2.4 in · 4:3 About 17.8 cm² rectangular area

C6L 2020 has approximately 370.1% more rectangular screen area than E52.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.