BLU G50 Mega vs Nokia 2.2

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight2.2: 37 g lighter2.2: 153 g · G50 Mega: 190 g
• Width2.2: 1.9 mm narrower2.2: 70.6 mm · G50 Mega: 72.5 mm
• Screen diagonal2.2: 0.79 in smaller diagonal2.2: 5.71 in · G50 Mega: 6.5 in
• Rear camera layoutDual / SingleG50 Mega: Dual · 2.2: Single
• Height2.2: 10.1 mm shorter2.2: 146 mm · G50 Mega: 156.1 mm
• Release year2020 / 2019G50 Mega: 2020 · 2.2: 2019

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. G50 Mega

   Height

   156.1 mm+10.1 mm versus 2.2

   Width

   72.5 mm+1.9 mm versus 2.2

   Depth

   9.3 mm

   Weight

   190 g

2. 2. 2.2

   Height

   146 mm

   Width

   70.6 mm

   Depth

   9.3 mm

   Weight

   153 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. G50 Mega 6.5 in · 20:9 About 102 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. 2.2 5.71 in · 19:9 About 81.4 cm² rectangular area

G50 Mega has approximately 25.3% more rectangular screen area than 2.2.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.