Acer Allegro vs ZTE V875

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Width

  Allegro: 1 mm narrower

  Allegro:

  59 mm

  V875:

  60 mm

• Screen diagonal

  V875: 0.4 in smaller diagonal

  Allegro:

  3.6 in

  V875:

  3.2 in

• Depth

  V875: 1.7 mm thinner

  Allegro:

  13 mm

  V875:

  11.3 mm

• Height

  Allegro: 6 mm shorter

  Allegro:

  116 mm

  V875:

  122 mm

• Release year

  Allegro:

  2011

  V875:

  2012

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Allegro

   Height:

   116 mm

   Width:

   59 mm

   Depth:

   13 mm +1.7 mm versus V875

2. 2. V875

   Height:

   122 mm +6 mm versus Allegro

   Width:

   60 mm +1 mm versus Allegro

   Depth:

   11.3 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Allegro

   Screen diagonal:

   3.6 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   5:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   36.9 cm²

2. 2. V875

   Screen diagonal:

   3.2 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   31.7 cm²

Allegro has approximately 16.3% more rectangular screen area than V875.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.