Acer beTouch E101 vs Acer Liquid Express E320

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  beTouch E101: 20 g lighter

  beTouch E101:

  118 g

  Liquid Express E320:

  138 g

• Width

  beTouch E101: 4.8 mm narrower

  beTouch E101:

  56 mm

  Liquid Express E320:

  60.8 mm

• Screen diagonal

  beTouch E101: 0.3 in smaller diagonal

  beTouch E101:

  3.2 in

  Liquid Express E320:

  3.5 in

• Chipset

  beTouch E101:

  Qualcomm MSM7225 Snapdragon S1

  Liquid Express E320:

  Qualcomm MSM7227T-1 Snapdragon S1

• Depth

  beTouch E101: 0.6 mm thinner

  beTouch E101:

  12.8 mm

  Liquid Express E320:

  13.4 mm

• Height

  beTouch E101: 2 mm shorter

  beTouch E101:

  113 mm

  Liquid Express E320:

  115 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. beTouch E101

   Height:

   113 mm

   Width:

   56 mm

   Depth:

   12.8 mm

2. 2. Liquid Express E320

   Height:

   115 mm +2 mm versus beTouch E101

   Width:

   60.8 mm +4.8 mm versus beTouch E101

   Depth:

   13.4 mm +0.6 mm versus beTouch E101

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. beTouch E101

   Screen diagonal:

   3.2 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   5:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   29.1 cm²

2. 2. Liquid Express E320

   Screen diagonal:

   3.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   33.8 cm²

Liquid Express E320 has approximately 15.9% more rectangular screen area than beTouch E101.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.