Acer DX650 vs Acer Liquid E3

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthDX650: 9 mm narrowerDX650: 59 mm · Liquid E3: 68 mm
• Screen diagonalDX650: 1.9 in smaller diagonalDX650: 2.8 in · Liquid E3: 4.7 in
• DepthLiquid E3: 6.6 mm thinnerLiquid E3: 9 mm · DX650: 15.6 mm
• HeightDX650: 26.4 mm shorterDX650: 109.6 mm · Liquid E3: 136 mm
• Release year2009 / 2014DX650: 2009 · Liquid E3: 2014

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. DX650

   Height

   109.6 mm

   Width

   59 mm

   Depth

   15.6 mm+6.6 mm versus Liquid E3

   Weight

   133 g

2. 2. Liquid E3

   Height

   136 mm+26.4 mm versus DX650

   Width

   68 mm+9 mm versus DX650

   Depth

   9 mm

   Weight

   134 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. DX650 2.8 in · 4:3 About 24.3 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. Liquid E3 4.7 in · 16:9 About 60.9 cm² rectangular area

Liquid E3 has approximately 150.8% more rectangular screen area than DX650.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.