Acer F900 vs Nokia E60

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightE60: 33 g lighterE60: 117 g · F900: 150 g
• WidthE60: 14.5 mm narrowerE60: 49 mm · F900: 63.5 mm
• Screen diagonalE60: 1.7 in smaller diagonalE60: 2.1 in · F900: 3.8 in
• DepthF900: 1.2 mm thinnerF900: 15.8 mm · E60: 17 mm
• HeightE60: 2.5 mm shorterE60: 115 mm · F900: 117.5 mm
• Release year2009 / 2005F900: 2009 · E60: 2005

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. F900

   Height

   117.5 mm

   Width

   63.5 mm

   Depth

   15.8 mm

   Weight

   150 g

2. 2. E60

   Height

   115 mm

   Width

   49 mm

   Depth

   17 mm

   Weight

   117 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.