You are using an outdated browser. For a faster, safer browsing experience, upgrade for free today.<
  1. Home
  2. Acer Liquid E2 vs Xolo Win Q900s

Acer Liquid E2 vs Xolo Win Q900s

Compare recorded specifications, size and practical differences.

+ Add a third phone
Enter at least 3 characters. Tab to a result and press Enter to select.

    Key differences

    Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

    • WeightWin Q900s: 40 g lighterWin Q900s: 100 g · Liquid E2: 140 g
    • Screen diagonalLiquid E2: 0.2 in smaller diagonalLiquid E2: 4.5 in · Win Q900s: 4.7 in
    • ChipsetMediatek MT6589 (28 nm) / Qualcomm MSM8212 Snapdragon 200 (28 nm)Liquid E2: Mediatek MT6589 (28 nm) · Win Q900s: Qualcomm MSM8212 Snapdragon 200 (28 nm)
    • DepthWin Q900s: 2.7 mm thinnerWin Q900s: 7.2 mm · Liquid E2: 9.9 mm
    • HeightLiquid E2: 4.8 mm shorterLiquid E2: 131 mm · Win Q900s: 135.8 mm
    • Release year2013 / 2014Liquid E2: 2013 · Win Q900s: 2014

    Physical size

    Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

    Front
    Liquid E2: 131 × 68 mm 1 Win Q900s: 135.8 × 67.2 mm 2
    Side
    Liquid E2: 131 × 9.9 mm 1 Win Q900s: 135.8 × 7.2 mm 2
    1. 1. Liquid E2
      Height
      131 mm
      Width
      68 mm
      Depth
      9.9 mm+2.7 mm versus Win Q900s
      Weight
      140 g
    2. 2. Win Q900s
      Height
      135.8 mm+4.8 mm versus Liquid E2
      Width
      67.2 mm
      Depth
      7.2 mm
      Weight
      100 g
    Weight

    Bars start at zero and share a scale within this chart.

    1. 1. Liquid E2140 g

      +40 g versus Win Q900s

    2. 2. Win Q900s100 g

    Screen size

    Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

    Screen size
    Liquid E2: 4.5 in, 16:9, About 55.8 cm² rectangular area 1 Win Q900s: 4.7 in, 16:9, About 60.9 cm² rectangular area 2
    1. 1. Liquid E2 4.5 in · 16:9 About 55.8 cm² rectangular area
    2. 2. Win Q900s 4.7 in · 16:9 About 60.9 cm² rectangular area

    Win Q900s has approximately 9.1% more rectangular screen area than Liquid E2.

    Memory variants

    Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

    Recorded RAM by storage capacity and phone
    StorageLiquid E2Win Q900s
    4 GB 1 GB RAM Not recorded
    8 GB Not recorded 1 GB RAM

    Practical features

    Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

    1. Liquid E2

    NFC
    See details Super AMOLED
    Headphone jack
    Yes
    Memory card support
    See details microSD · up to 32 GB (dedicated slot)

    2. Win Q900s

    NFC
    Unknown
    Headphone jack
    Yes
    Memory card support
    See details microSD · up to 32 GB

    Battery capacity

    Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

    Recorded capacity

    Bars start at zero and share a scale within this chart.

    1. 1. Liquid E22000 mAh

      +200 mAh versus Win Q900s

    2. 2. Win Q900s1800 mAh

    Specifications

    Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.

    1. Liquid E22. Win Q900s

    Everyday essentials
    Everyday essentials
    SpecificationLiquid E2Win Q900s
    Dimensions (HxWxD)
    • 131 Х 68 Х 9.9 mm
    • 135.8 Х 67.2 Х 7.2 mm
    Weight
    • 140 g
    • 100 g
    Technology
    • IPS LCD
    • IPS LCD
    Screen size
    • 4.5" inch
    • 4.7" inch
    Screen resolution
    • 540 x 960 px
    • 720 x 1280 px
    Internal memoryRecorded storage / RAM variants. Entries are alternatives, not a combined maximum. Ambiguous formats stay as recorded.
    • 4 GB
    • 1 GB RAM
    • 8 GB
    • 1 GB RAM
    Memory card support
    • microSD
    • up to 32 GB (dedicated slot)
    • microSD
    • up to 32 GB
    BatteryCapacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.
    • 2000 mAh
    • Removable Li-Ion
    • 1800 mAh
    • Removable Li-Po
    Operating system OS
    • Android 4.2.1 (Jelly Bean)
    • Microsoft Windows Phone 8.1
    Chipset
    • Mediatek MT6589 (28 nm)
    • Qualcomm MSM8212 Snapdragon 200 (28 nm)
    NFC
    • Super AMOLED
    		 Unknown
    Headphone jack
    • Yes
    • Yes
    Display
    Display
    SpecificationLiquid E2Win Q900s
    Touchscreen
    • capacitive touchscreen
    • capacitive touchscreen
    Display colors
    • 16M
    • 16M
    Screen area
    • 55.8 cm2
    • 60.9 cm2
    Screen format
    • 16:9 (height:width)
    • 16:9 (height:width)
    Screen to body ratio
    • 62.7%
    • 66.7%
    PPI /points per inch/
    • 245 PPI
    • 312 PPI
    Screen protection Unknown
    • Scratch-resistant glass
    Camera and Video
    Camera and Video
    SpecificationLiquid E2Win Q900s
    Rear camera, main
    • 8 MP
    • Single
    • 8 MP
    • Single
    Camera specs
    • 8 MP
    • AF
    • 8 MP
    • AF
    Functions
    • Dual-LED flash
    • LED flash
    • panorama
    Video
    • 1080p@30fps
    • Yes
    Front camera, selfie
    • 2 MP
    • Single
    • 2 MP
    • Single
    Specifications
    • 2 MP
    • 2 MP
    Performance
    Performance
    SpecificationLiquid E2Win Q900s
    Processor CPU
    • Quad-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A7
    • Quad-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A7
    Graphics processor GPU
    • PowerVR SGX544
    • Adreno 302
    Antutu 7 scoreLegacy recorded score. Test conditions are unspecified; no new testing is implied.
    • 14005
    		 Unknown
    GeekBench 4 Single CoreLegacy recorded score. Test conditions are unspecified; no new testing is implied.
    • 2870 mAh
    		 Unknown
    GeekBench 4 Multi-CoreLegacy recorded score. Test conditions are unspecified; no new testing is implied.
    • 1036
    		 Unknown
    General specs
    General specs
    SpecificationLiquid E2Win Q900s
    Release date
    • 2013
    • April
    • 2014
    • June
    Colors
    • Black
    • White
    • Black
    • White
    Historical recorded priceLegacy catalogue value; date unknown. Not a current offer.
    • 180 EUR
    • 120 EUR
    Battery life
    • Stand by time- Up to 450 h Talking time- Up to 9 h
    • Stand by time- Up to 263 h (2G) / Up to 246 h (3G) Talking time- Up to 23 h (2G) / Up to 14 h (3G)
    Communication and Connectivity
    Communication and Connectivity
    SpecificationLiquid E2Win Q900s
    SIM card
    • Single SIM (Micro-SIM)Dual SIM (Micro-SIM
    • dual stand-by)
    • Dual SIM (dual stand-by)
    Network
    • Show all network frequencies: -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only)-3G - HSDPA-4G - LTE
    • Show all network frequencies: -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2
    Speed
    • HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps
    • HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps
    GPRS
    • Yes
    • Yes
    Edge
    • Yes
    • Yes
    Wi-Fi
    • Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n
    • hotspot
    • Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n
    • hotspot
    GPS
    • Yes
    • with A-GPS
    • Yes
    • with A-GPS
    USB
    • microUSB 2.0
    • microUSB 2.0
    Bluetooth
    • 3.0
    • A2DP
    • EDR
    • 4.0
    • A2DP
    • EDR
    Harmful irradiation
    • SAR EU - 0.23 W/kg (head)
    		 Unknown
    Music and Audio
    Music and Audio
    SpecificationLiquid E2Win Q900s
    Radio
    • FM radio
    • FM radio
    Others
    • DTS sound -Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic
    		 Unknown
    Other features
    Other features
    SpecificationLiquid E2Win Q900s
    Dop
    • Sensors Accelerometer
    • gyro
    • proximity
    • compass - Also known as Acer Liquid E2 Duo with dual-SIM card slots
    • Sensors Accelerometer
    • proximity
    • compass - For India

    Similar comparisons