Acer Liquid Express E320 vs HTC Windows Phone 8S

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  Windows Phone 8S: 25 g lighter

  Liquid Express E320:

  138 g

  Windows Phone 8S:

  113 g

• Width

  Liquid Express E320: 2.2 mm narrower

  Liquid Express E320:

  60.8 mm

  Windows Phone 8S:

  63 mm

• Screen diagonal

  Liquid Express E320: 0.5 in smaller diagonal

  Liquid Express E320:

  3.5 in

  Windows Phone 8S:

  4 in

• Chipset

  Liquid Express E320:

  Qualcomm MSM7227T-1 Snapdragon S1

  Windows Phone 8S:

  Qualcomm Snapdragon S4

• Depth

  Windows Phone 8S: 3.1 mm thinner

  Liquid Express E320:

  13.4 mm

  Windows Phone 8S:

  10.3 mm

• Height

  Liquid Express E320: 5.5 mm shorter

  Liquid Express E320:

  115 mm

  Windows Phone 8S:

  120.5 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Liquid Express E320

   Height:

   115 mm

   Width:

   60.8 mm

   Depth:

   13.4 mm +3.1 mm versus Windows Phone 8S

2. 2. Windows Phone 8S

   Height:

   120.5 mm +5.5 mm versus Liquid Express E320

   Width:

   63 mm +2.2 mm versus Liquid Express E320

   Depth:

   10.3 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Liquid Express E320

   Screen diagonal:

   3.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   33.8 cm²

2. 2. Windows Phone 8S

   Screen diagonal:

   4 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   5:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   45.5 cm²

Windows Phone 8S has approximately 34.9% more rectangular screen area than Liquid Express E320.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.