Acer Liquid Express E320 vs Samsung M130K Galaxy K

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  M130K Galaxy K: 7 g lighter

  Liquid Express E320:

  138 g

  M130K Galaxy K:

  131 g

• Width

  M130K Galaxy K: 1.2 mm narrower

  Liquid Express E320:

  60.8 mm

  M130K Galaxy K:

  59.6 mm

• Screen diagonal

  Liquid Express E320: 0.2 in smaller diagonal

  Liquid Express E320:

  3.5 in

  M130K Galaxy K:

  3.7 in

• Depth

  M130K Galaxy K: 1 mm thinner

  Liquid Express E320:

  13.4 mm

  M130K Galaxy K:

  12.4 mm

• Height

  Liquid Express E320: 4.5 mm shorter

  Liquid Express E320:

  115 mm

  M130K Galaxy K:

  119.5 mm

• Release year

  Liquid Express E320:

  2011

  M130K Galaxy K:

  2010

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Liquid Express E320

   Height:

   115 mm

   Width:

   60.8 mm +1.2 mm versus M130K Galaxy K

   Depth:

   13.4 mm +1 mm versus M130K Galaxy K

2. 2. M130K Galaxy K

   Height:

   119.5 mm +4.5 mm versus Liquid Express E320

   Width:

   59.6 mm

   Depth:

   12.4 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Liquid Express E320

   Screen diagonal:

   3.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   33.8 cm²

2. 2. M130K Galaxy K

   Screen diagonal:

   3.7 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   5:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   39 cm²

M130K Galaxy K has approximately 15.4% more rectangular screen area than Liquid Express E320.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.