Acer Liquid vs Philips W920

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthLiquid: 7.5 mm narrowerLiquid: 62.5 mm · W920: 70 mm
• Screen diagonalLiquid: 0.8 in smaller diagonalLiquid: 3.5 in · W920: 4.3 in
• HeightLiquid: 13 mm shorterLiquid: 115 mm · W920: 128 mm
• Release year2009 / 2011Liquid: 2009 · W920: 2011

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Liquid

   Height

   115 mm

   Width

   62.5 mm

   Depth

   12.5 mm

   Weight

   135 g

2. 2. W920

   Height

   128 mm+13 mm versus Liquid

   Width

   70 mm+7.5 mm versus Liquid

   Depth

   12.9 mm

   Weight

   Unknown

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Liquid 3.5 in · 5:3 About 34.9 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. W920 4.3 in · 5:3 About 52.6 cm² rectangular area

W920 has approximately 50.9% more rectangular screen area than Liquid.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.