alcatel Fire C 2G vs Sharp Aquos Zero

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightFire C 2G: 53 g lighterFire C 2G: 93 g · Aquos Zero: 146 g
• WidthFire C 2G: 11 mm narrowerFire C 2G: 62 mm · Aquos Zero: 73 mm
• Screen diagonalFire C 2G: 2.7 in smaller diagonalFire C 2G: 3.5 in · Aquos Zero: 6.2 in
• ChipsetSpreadtrum 6821 / Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm)Fire C 2G: Spreadtrum 6821 · Aquos Zero: Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm)
• DepthAquos Zero: 3.2 mm thinnerAquos Zero: 8.8 mm · Fire C 2G: 12 mm
• HeightFire C 2G: 41.8 mm shorterFire C 2G: 112.2 mm · Aquos Zero: 154 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Fire C 2G

   Height

   112.2 mm

   Width

   62 mm

   Depth

   12 mm

   Weight

   93 g

2. 2. Aquos Zero

   Height

   154 mm

   Width

   73 mm

   Depth

   8.8 mm

   Weight

   146 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.

Similar comparisons

• A1 Lite vs Aquos Zero
• Aquos Zero vs Xperia 1