alcatel Flash vs Philips T939

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthT939: 18.4 mm narrowerT939: 57.8 mm · Flash: 76.2 mm
• Screen diagonalT939: 2.3 in smaller diagonalT939: 3.2 in · Flash: 5.5 in
• DepthFlash: 13.9 mm thinnerFlash: 8.1 mm · T939: 22 mm
• HeightT939: 42.1 mm shorterT939: 110 mm · Flash: 152.1 mm
• Release year2014 / 2013Flash: 2014 · T939: 2013

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Flash

   Height

   152.1 mm+42.1 mm versus T939

   Width

   76.2 mm+18.4 mm versus T939

   Depth

   8.1 mm

   Weight

   Unknown

2. 2. T939

   Height

   110 mm

   Width

   57.8 mm

   Depth

   22 mm+13.9 mm versus Flash

   Weight

   239.5 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Flash 5.5 in · 16:9 About 83.4 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. T939 3.2 in · 5:3 About 29.1 cm² rectangular area

Flash has approximately 186.1% more rectangular screen area than T939.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.