alcatel OT-908F vs Motorola Moto E Dual SIM

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  OT-908F: 22 g lighter

  OT-908F:

  120 g

  Moto E Dual SIM:

  142 g

• Width

  OT-908F: 7.4 mm narrower

  OT-908F:

  57.4 mm

  Moto E Dual SIM:

  64.8 mm

• Screen diagonal

  OT-908F: 1.5 in smaller diagonal

  OT-908F:

  2.8 in

  Moto E Dual SIM:

  4.3 in

• Height

  OT-908F: 14.8 mm shorter

  OT-908F:

  110 mm

  Moto E Dual SIM:

  124.8 mm

• Release year

  OT-908F:

  2011

  Moto E Dual SIM:

  2014

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. OT-908F

   Height:

   110 mm

   Width:

   57.4 mm

   Depth:

   12.4 mm

2. 2. Moto E Dual SIM

   Height:

   124.8 mm +14.8 mm versus OT-908F

   Width:

   64.8 mm +7.4 mm versus OT-908F

   Depth:

   12.3 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. OT-908F

   Screen diagonal:

   2.8 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   24.3 cm²

2. 2. Moto E Dual SIM

   Screen diagonal:

   4.3 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   51 cm²

Moto E Dual SIM has approximately 109.9% more rectangular screen area than OT-908F.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.