alcatel Pop C9 vs Nokia E61

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightE61: 45 g lighterE61: 144 g · Pop C9: 189 g
• WidthE61: 7.8 mm narrowerE61: 69.7 mm · Pop C9: 77.5 mm
• Screen diagonalE61: 2.6 in smaller diagonalE61: 2.9 in · Pop C9: 5.5 in
• DepthPop C9: 4.5 mm thinnerPop C9: 9.5 mm · E61: 14 mm
• HeightE61: 34 mm shorterE61: 117 mm · Pop C9: 151 mm
• Release year2014 / 2005Pop C9: 2014 · E61: 2005

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Pop C9

   Height

   151 mm+34 mm versus E61

   Width

   77.5 mm+7.8 mm versus E61

   Depth

   9.5 mm

   Weight

   189 g

2. 2. E61

   Height

   117 mm

   Width

   69.7 mm

   Depth

   14 mm+4.5 mm versus Pop C9

   Weight

   144 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Pop C9 5.5 in · 16:9 About 83.4 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. E61 2.9 in · 4:3 About 26 cm² rectangular area

Pop C9 has approximately 220.2% more rectangular screen area than E61.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.