alcatel Pop S9 vs Nokia E60

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightE60: 65 g lighterE60: 117 g · Pop S9: 182 g
• WidthE60: 35.4 mm narrowerE60: 49 mm · Pop S9: 84.4 mm
• Screen diagonalE60: 3.8 in smaller diagonalE60: 2.1 in · Pop S9: 5.9 in
• DepthPop S9: 8.4 mm thinnerPop S9: 8.6 mm · E60: 17 mm
• HeightE60: 47.4 mm shorterE60: 115 mm · Pop S9: 162.4 mm
• Release year2014 / 2005Pop S9: 2014 · E60: 2005

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Pop S9

   Height

   162.4 mm+47.4 mm versus E60

   Width

   84.4 mm+35.4 mm versus E60

   Depth

   8.6 mm

   Weight

   182 g

2. 2. E60

   Height

   115 mm

   Width

   49 mm

   Depth

   17 mm+8.4 mm versus Pop S9

   Weight

   117 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

At least two phones need compatible screen dimensions for a drawing.

1. 1. Pop S9 5.9 in · 16:9 About 96 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. E60 Screen geometry unavailable or conflicting

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.