Allview E2 Jump vs Nokia 3.1 C

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthE2 Jump: 5.1 mm narrowerE2 Jump: 66.8 mm · 3.1 C: 71.9 mm
• Screen diagonalE2 Jump: 0.95 in smaller diagonalE2 Jump: 4.5 in · 3.1 C: 5.45 in
• ChipsetMediatek MT6582 (28 nm) / Qualcomm SDM429 Snapdragon 429E2 Jump: Mediatek MT6582 (28 nm) · 3.1 C: Qualcomm SDM429 Snapdragon 429
• Depth3.1 C: 1.6 mm thinner3.1 C: 9.4 mm · E2 Jump: 11 mm
• HeightE2 Jump: 18.1 mm shorterE2 Jump: 134.6 mm · 3.1 C: 152.7 mm
• Release year2015 / 2019E2 Jump: 2015 · 3.1 C: 2019

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. E2 Jump

   Height

   134.6 mm

   Width

   66.8 mm

   Depth

   11 mm

   Weight

   152 g

2. 2. 3.1 C

   Height

   152.7 mm

   Width

   71.9 mm

   Depth

   9.4 mm

   Weight

   156 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.