Allview E2 Jump vs Xolo Q3000

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthE2 Jump: 14.8 mm narrowerE2 Jump: 66.8 mm · Q3000: 81.6 mm
• Screen diagonalE2 Jump: 1.2 in smaller diagonalE2 Jump: 4.5 in · Q3000: 5.7 in
• ChipsetMediatek MT6582 (28 nm) / Mediatek MT6589 (28 nm)E2 Jump: Mediatek MT6582 (28 nm) · Q3000: Mediatek MT6589 (28 nm)
• DepthQ3000: 2.1 mm thinnerQ3000: 8.9 mm · E2 Jump: 11 mm
• HeightE2 Jump: 30.2 mm shorterE2 Jump: 134.6 mm · Q3000: 164.8 mm
• Release year2015 / 2013E2 Jump: 2015 · Q3000: 2013

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. E2 Jump

   Height

   134.6 mm

   Width

   66.8 mm

   Depth

   11 mm

   Weight

   152 g

2. 2. Q3000

   Height

   164.8 mm

   Width

   81.6 mm

   Depth

   8.9 mm

   Weight

   Unknown

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.