Allview E2 Living vs Xolo LT900

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightE2 Living: 20.2 g lighterE2 Living: 119.8 g · LT900: 140 g
• WidthE2 Living: 4.1 mm narrowerE2 Living: 61.9 mm · LT900: 66 mm
• Screen diagonalE2 Living: 0.3 in smaller diagonalE2 Living: 4 in · LT900: 4.3 in
• HeightE2 Living: 4.1 mm shorterE2 Living: 124.6 mm · LT900: 128.7 mm
• Release year2014 / 2013E2 Living: 2014 · LT900: 2013

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. E2 Living

   Height

   124.6 mm

   Width

   61.9 mm

   Depth

   9.5 mm

   Weight

   119.8 g

2. 2. LT900

   Height

   128.7 mm+4.1 mm versus E2 Living

   Width

   66 mm+4.1 mm versus E2 Living

   Depth

   9.8 mm

   Weight

   140 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. E2 Living 4 in · 5:3 About 45.5 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. LT900 4.3 in · 16:9 About 51 cm² rectangular area

LT900 has approximately 11.9% more rectangular screen area than E2 Living.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.