You are using an outdated browser. For a faster, safer browsing experience, upgrade for free today.<
  1. Home
  2. Allview E3 Sign vs Vertu Ti

Allview E3 Sign vs Vertu Ti

Compare recorded specifications, size and practical differences.

Vertu Ti

Vertu Ti

Replace Ti
Enter at least 3 characters. Tab to a result and press Enter to select.

    Remove Ti
    + Add a third phone
    Enter at least 3 characters. Tab to a result and press Enter to select.

      Key differences

      Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

      • Screen diagonalTi: 1.8 in smaller diagonalTi: 3.7 in · E3 Sign: 5.5 in
      • Release year2015 / 2013E3 Sign: 2015 · Ti: 2013

      Physical size

      Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

      Front
      E3 Sign: 152.5 × 75.9 mm 1
      Side
      E3 Sign: 152.5 × 9.3 mm 1
      1. 1. E3 Sign
        Height
        152.5 mm
        Width
        75.9 mm
        Depth
        9.3 mm
        Weight
        161.9 g
      2. 2. Ti
        Height
        Unknown
        Width
        Unknown
        Depth
        Unknown
        Weight
        Unknown

        Unavailable dimensions are omitted from the drawing.

      Specifications

      Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.

      Everyday essentials
      Everyday essentials
      SpecificationE3 SignTi
      Dimensions (HxWxD)
      • 152.5 Х 75.9 Х 9.3 mm
      • Х Х mm
      Weight
      • 161.9 g
      • 0 g
      Technology
      • IPS LCD
      • Sapphire crystal glass
      Screen size
      • 5.5" inch
      • 3.7" inch
      Screen resolution
      • 720 x 1280 px
      • 480 x 800 px
      Internal memoryRecorded storage / RAM variants. Entries are alternatives, not a combined maximum. Ambiguous formats stay as recorded.
      • 16 GB
      • 2 GB RAM
      • 64 GB
      • 1 GB RAM
      Memory card support
      • microSD
      • up to 32 GB (dedicated slot)
      • microSD
      • up to 32 GB (dedicated slot)
      BatteryCapacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.
      • 2800 mAh
      • Removable Li-Po
      • 0 mAh,
      Operating system OS
      • Android 4.4.2 (KitKat)
      • Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich)
      Chipset
      • Mediatek MT6582 (28 nm)
      		 Unknown
      NFC
      • Super AMOLED
      		 Unknown
      Headphone jack
      • Yes
      • Yes
      Display
      Display
      SpecificationE3 SignTi
      Touchscreen
      • capacitive touchscreen
      • capacitive touchscreen
      Display colors
      • Super AMOLED
      • 16M
      Screen area
      • 83.4 cm2
      • 39.0 cm2
      Screen format
      • 16:9 (height:width)
      • 5:3 (height:width)
      Screen to body ratio
      • 72.0%
      		 Unknown
      PPI /points per inch/
      • 267 PPI
      • 252 PPI
      Screen protection
      • Scratch-resistant glass
      • Scratch-resistant glass
      Camera and Video
      Camera and Video
      SpecificationE3 SignTi
      Rear camera, main
      • 8 MP
      • Single
      • 8 MP
      • Single
      Camera specs
      • 8 MP
      • AF
      • 8 MP
      • AF
      Functions
      • Dual-LED flash
      • HDR
      • LED flash
      Video
      • 1080p@30fps
      • 1080p@30fps
      Front camera, selfie
      • 2 MP
      • Single
      • 1.3 MP
      • Single
      Specifications
      • 2 MP
      • 1.3 MP
      Performance
      Performance
      SpecificationE3 SignTi
      Processor CPU
      • Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7
      • Dual-core 1.7 GHz
      Graphics processor GPU
      • Mali-400MP2 Z525 -Mali-T720MP2 Z528
      		 Unknown
      Antutu 7 scoreLegacy recorded score. Test conditions are unspecified; no new testing is implied.
      • 24156
      • 3267
      General specs
      General specs
      SpecificationE3 SignTi
      Release date
      • 2015
      • March
      • 2013
      • February
      Colors
      • Black
      • Black/Gray
      Historical recorded priceLegacy catalogue value; date unknown. Not a current offer. Unknown
      • 7900 EUR
      Battery life
      • Stand by time- Up to 280 h Talking time- Up to 10 h 20 min
      		 Unknown
      Communication and Connectivity
      Communication and Connectivity
      SpecificationE3 SignTi
      SIM card
      • Single SIM (Micro-SIM)Dual SIM (Micro-SIM
      • dual stand-by)
      • Mini-SIM
      Network
      • Show all network frequencies: -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2-3G - HSDPA 900 / 2100-4G - LTE
      • Show all network frequencies: -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
      Speed
      • HSPA 21.1/11.5 Mbps
      • HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps
      GPRS
      • Class 12
      • Yes
      Edge
      • Class 10
      • Yes
      Wi-Fi
      • Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n
      • Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n
      • hotspot
      GPS
      • Yes
      • with A-GPS
      • Yes
      • with A-GPS
      USB
      • microUSB 2.0
      • microUSB 2.0
      Bluetooth
      • 4.0
      • A2DP
      • EDR
      • 4.0
      • A2DP
      Harmful irradiation
      • SAR EU - 0.67 W/kg (head)
      		 Unknown
      Music and Audio
      Music and Audio
      SpecificationE3 SignTi
      Radio
      • FM radio
      • No
      Others Unknown
      • Active noise cancellation with dedicated mic
      Other features
      Other features
      SpecificationE3 SignTi
      Dop
      • Sensors Fingerprint (rear-mounted)
      • Sensors Accelerometer
      • proximity - Also known as Liquid E3 E380 Available as Acer Liquid E3 Duo with dual-SIM card slots
      • Infrared port - Fast battery charging (Pump Express 2.0+) - For metroPCS
      • Sensors Accelerometer
      • proximity
      • compass - Titanium body (grade 5)

      Similar comparisons