Allview E3 Sign vs ZTE Blade A3

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Chipset

  E3 Sign:

  Mediatek MT6582 (28 nm)

  Blade A3:

  Mediatek MT6737T (28 nm)

• Depth

  Blade A3: 1.1 mm thinner

  E3 Sign:

  9.3 mm

  Blade A3:

  8.2 mm

• Release year

  E3 Sign:

  2015

  Blade A3:

  2017

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. E3 Sign

   Height:

   152.5 mm

   Width:

   75.9 mm

   Depth:

   9.3 mm +1.1 mm versus Blade A3

2. 2. Blade A3

   Height:

   152.4 mm

   Width:

   75.8 mm

   Depth:

   8.2 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. E3 Sign

   Screen diagonal:

   5.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   83.4 cm²

2. 2. Blade A3

   Screen diagonal:

   5.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   83.4 cm²

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.