Allview Viper E vs Samsung i300

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Widthi300: 17 mm narroweri300: 48 mm · Viper E: 65 mm
• Screen diagonali300: 2.5 in smaller diagonali300: 2 in · Viper E: 4.5 in
• DepthViper E: 12.2 mm thinnerViper E: 7.8 mm · i300: 20 mm
• Heighti300: 18 mm shorteri300: 113 mm · Viper E: 131 mm
• Release year2014 / 2005Viper E: 2014 · i300: 2005

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Viper E

   Height

   131 mm+18 mm versus i300

   Width

   65 mm+17 mm versus i300

   Depth

   7.8 mm

   Weight

   122.5 g

2. 2. i300

   Height

   113 mm

   Width

   48 mm

   Depth

   20 mm+12.2 mm versus Viper E

   Weight

   121 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Viper E 4.5 in · 16:9 About 55.8 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. i300 2 in · 4:3 About 12.4 cm² rectangular area

Viper E has approximately 350.7% more rectangular screen area than i300.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.