Allview Viper E vs Xolo LT900

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightViper E: 17.5 g lighterViper E: 122.5 g · LT900: 140 g
• WidthViper E: 1 mm narrowerViper E: 65 mm · LT900: 66 mm
• Screen diagonalLT900: 0.2 in smaller diagonalLT900: 4.3 in · Viper E: 4.5 in
• ChipsetMediatek MT6582 (28 nm) / Qualcomm MSM8960 Snapdragon S4 PlusViper E: Mediatek MT6582 (28 nm) · LT900: Qualcomm MSM8960 Snapdragon S4 Plus
• DepthViper E: 2 mm thinnerViper E: 7.8 mm · LT900: 9.8 mm
• HeightLT900: 2.3 mm shorterLT900: 128.7 mm · Viper E: 131 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Viper E

   Height

   131 mm

   Width

   65 mm

   Depth

   7.8 mm

   Weight

   122.5 g

2. 2. LT900

   Height

   128.7 mm

   Width

   66 mm

   Depth

   9.8 mm

   Weight

   140 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.