Allview W1s vs Nokia 3.1 C

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Chipset

  W1s:

  Qualcomm MSM8212 Snapdragon 200 (28 nm)

  3.1 C:

  Qualcomm SDM429 Snapdragon 429

• Depth

  W1s: 0.6 mm thinner

  W1s:

  8.8 mm

  3.1 C:

  9.4 mm

• Height

  W1s: 7.8 mm shorter

  W1s:

  144.9 mm

  3.1 C:

  152.7 mm

• Release year

  W1s:

  2014

  3.1 C:

  2019

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. W1s

   Height:

   144.9 mm

   Width:

   72.1 mm

   Depth:

   8.8 mm

2. 2. 3.1 C

   Height:

   152.7 mm +7.8 mm versus W1s

   Width:

   71.9 mm

   Depth:

   9.4 mm +0.6 mm versus W1s

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

At least two phones need compatible screen dimensions for a drawing.

1. 1. W1s

   W1s: Screen geometry unavailable or conflicting.

2. 2. 3.1 C

   Screen diagonal:

   5.45 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   18:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   76.7 cm²

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.