Amoi E72 vs Nokia 3.1 C

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightE72: 6 g lighterE72: 150 g · 3.1 C: 156 g
• WidthE72: 27.1 mm narrowerE72: 44.8 mm · 3.1 C: 71.9 mm
• Screen diagonalE72: 2.25 in smaller diagonalE72: 3.2 in · 3.1 C: 5.45 in
• Depth3.1 C: 5.4 mm thinner3.1 C: 9.4 mm · E72: 14.8 mm
• HeightE72: 52.7 mm shorterE72: 100 mm · 3.1 C: 152.7 mm
• Release year2007 / 2019E72: 2007 · 3.1 C: 2019

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. E72

   Height

   100 mm

   Width

   44.8 mm

   Depth

   14.8 mm

   Weight

   150 g

2. 2. 3.1 C

   Height

   152.7 mm

   Width

   71.9 mm

   Depth

   9.4 mm

   Weight

   156 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.