Amoi E72 vs Oppo R819

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightR819: 40 g lighterR819: 110 g · E72: 150 g
• WidthE72: 23.2 mm narrowerE72: 44.8 mm · R819: 68 mm
• Screen diagonalE72: 1.5 in smaller diagonalE72: 3.2 in · R819: 4.7 in
• DepthR819: 7.5 mm thinnerR819: 7.3 mm · E72: 14.8 mm
• HeightE72: 36.5 mm shorterE72: 100 mm · R819: 136.5 mm
• Release year2007 / 2013E72: 2007 · R819: 2013

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. E72

   Height

   100 mm

   Width

   44.8 mm

   Depth

   14.8 mm+7.5 mm versus R819

   Weight

   150 g

2. 2. R819

   Height

   136.5 mm+36.5 mm versus E72

   Width

   68 mm+23.2 mm versus E72

   Depth

   7.3 mm

   Weight

   110 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

At least two phones need compatible screen dimensions for a drawing.

1. 1. E72 Screen geometry unavailable or conflicting
2. 2. R819 4.7 in · 16:9 About 60.9 cm² rectangular area

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.