Amoi E76 vs Xolo Win Q1000

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthE76: 20.3 mm narrowerE76: 51 mm · Win Q1000: 71.3 mm
• Screen diagonalE76: 2.8 in smaller diagonalE76: 2.2 in · Win Q1000: 5 in
• DepthWin Q1000: 8 mm thinnerWin Q1000: 8.8 mm · E76: 16.8 mm
• HeightE76: 43 mm shorterE76: 100 mm · Win Q1000: 143 mm
• Release year2007 / 2015E76: 2007 · Win Q1000: 2015

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. E76

   Height

   100 mm

   Width

   51 mm

   Depth

   16.8 mm+8 mm versus Win Q1000

   Weight

   150 g

2. 2. Win Q1000

   Height

   143 mm+43 mm versus E76

   Width

   71.3 mm+20.3 mm versus E76

   Depth

   8.8 mm

   Weight

   Unknown

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. E76 2.2 in · 4:3 About 15 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. Win Q1000 5 in · 16:9 About 68.9 cm² rectangular area

Win Q1000 has approximately 359.8% more rectangular screen area than E76.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.