Amoi E78 vs Xolo X500

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightX500: 18 g lighterX500: 132 g · E78: 150 g
• Screen diagonalE78: 1.04 in smaller diagonalE78: 2.46 in · X500: 3.5 in
• HeightX500: 4.5 mm shorterX500: 110.5 mm · E78: 115 mm
• Release year2007 / 2013E78: 2007 · X500: 2013

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. E78

   Height

   115 mm+4.5 mm versus X500

   Width

   61 mm

   Depth

   12.7 mm

   Weight

   150 g

2. 2. X500

   Height

   110.5 mm

   Width

   61 mm

   Depth

   12.6 mm

   Weight

   132 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. E78 2.46 in · 4:3 About 18.7 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. X500 3.5 in · 3:2 About 36.5 cm² rectangular area

X500 has approximately 94.6% more rectangular screen area than E78.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.