Amoi E860 vs Celkon Q54+

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthE860: 12.5 mm narrowerE860: 60.5 mm · Q54+: 73 mm
• Screen diagonalE860: 2.2 in smaller diagonalE860: 2.8 in · Q54+: 5 in
• DepthQ54+: 7 mm thinnerQ54+: 8.8 mm · E860: 15.8 mm
• HeightE860: 33 mm shorterE860: 112 mm · Q54+: 145 mm
• Release year2007 / 2015E860: 2007 · Q54+: 2015

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. E860

   Height

   112 mm

   Width

   60.5 mm

   Depth

   15.8 mm+7 mm versus Q54+

   Weight

   150 g

2. 2. Q54+

   Height

   145 mm+33 mm versus E860

   Width

   73 mm+12.5 mm versus E860

   Depth

   8.8 mm

   Weight

   150.6 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. E860 2.8 in · 4:3 About 24.3 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. Q54+ 5 in · 16:9 About 68.9 cm² rectangular area

Q54+ has approximately 183.9% more rectangular screen area than E860.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.

Similar comparisons

• Q54+ vs L Prime