Amoi E860 vs Dell XCD35

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightXCD35: 30 g lighterXCD35: 120 g · E860: 150 g
• WidthXCD35: 4.5 mm narrowerXCD35: 56 mm · E860: 60.5 mm
• Screen diagonalE860: 0.7 in smaller diagonalE860: 2.8 in · XCD35: 3.5 in
• DepthXCD35: 3.6 mm thinnerXCD35: 12.2 mm · E860: 15.8 mm
• HeightE860: 2 mm shorterE860: 112 mm · XCD35: 114 mm
• Release year2007 / 2010E860: 2007 · XCD35: 2010

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. E860

   Height

   112 mm

   Width

   60.5 mm

   Depth

   15.8 mm

   Weight

   150 g

2. 2. XCD35

   Height

   114 mm

   Width

   56 mm

   Depth

   12.2 mm

   Weight

   120 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.