Asus M930 vs Nokia N96

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightN96: 33 g lighterN96: 125 g · M930: 158 g
• WidthM930: 1 mm narrowerM930: 54 mm · N96: 55 mm
• Screen diagonalM930: 0.2 in smaller diagonalM930: 2.6 in · N96: 2.8 in
• DepthN96: 0.7 mm thinnerN96: 18 mm · M930: 18.7 mm
• HeightN96: 10 mm shorterN96: 103 mm · M930: 113 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. M930

   Height

   113 mm+10 mm versus N96

   Width

   54 mm

   Depth

   18.7 mm+0.7 mm versus N96

   Weight

   158 g

2. 2. N96

   Height

   103 mm

   Width

   55 mm+1 mm versus M930

   Depth

   18 mm

   Weight

   125 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. M930 2.6 in · 5:3 About 19.2 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. N96 2.8 in · 4:3 About 24.3 cm² rectangular area

N96 has approximately 26.2% more rectangular screen area than M930.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.