Asus P835 vs ZTE E N72

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightE N72: 18 g lighterE N72: 130 g · P835: 148 g
• WidthP835: 7 mm narrowerP835: 59 mm · E N72: 66 mm
• Screen diagonalE N72: 1 in smaller diagonalE N72: 2.5 in · P835: 3.5 in
• DepthE N72: 1.9 mm thinnerE N72: 11.9 mm · P835: 13.8 mm
• Release year2009 / 2010P835: 2009 · E N72: 2010

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. P835

   Height

   115 mm

   Width

   59 mm

   Depth

   13.8 mm+1.9 mm versus E N72

   Weight

   148 g

2. 2. E N72

   Height

   114 mm

   Width

   66 mm+7 mm versus P835

   Depth

   11.9 mm

   Weight

   130 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. P835 3.5 in · 5:3 About 34.9 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. E N72 2.5 in · 4:3 About 19.4 cm² rectangular area

P835 has approximately 80.1% more rectangular screen area than E N72.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.