BenQ F52 vs Nokia E61i

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightF52: 8 g lighterF52: 142 g · E61i: 150 g
• WidthE61i: 4.5 mm narrowerE61i: 70 mm · F52: 74.5 mm
• Screen diagonalE61i: 2.4 in smaller diagonalE61i: 2.8 in · F52: 5.2 in
• DepthF52: 4.6 mm thinnerF52: 9.3 mm · E61i: 13.9 mm
• HeightE61i: 30 mm shorterE61i: 117 mm · F52: 147 mm
• Release year2015 / 2007F52: 2015 · E61i: 2007

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. F52

   Height

   147 mm+30 mm versus E61i

   Width

   74.5 mm+4.5 mm versus E61i

   Depth

   9.3 mm

   Weight

   142 g

2. 2. E61i

   Height

   117 mm

   Width

   70 mm

   Depth

   13.9 mm+4.6 mm versus F52

   Weight

   150 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. F52 5.2 in · 16:9 About 74.5 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. E61i 2.8 in · 4:3 About 24.3 cm² rectangular area

F52 has approximately 207% more rectangular screen area than E61i.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.