BenQ F52 vs Nokia E65

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightE65: 27 g lighterE65: 115 g · F52: 142 g
• WidthE65: 25.5 mm narrowerE65: 49 mm · F52: 74.5 mm
• Screen diagonalE65: 3 in smaller diagonalE65: 2.2 in · F52: 5.2 in
• DepthF52: 6.2 mm thinnerF52: 9.3 mm · E65: 15.5 mm
• HeightE65: 42 mm shorterE65: 105 mm · F52: 147 mm
• Release year2015 / 2007F52: 2015 · E65: 2007

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. F52

   Height

   147 mm

   Width

   74.5 mm

   Depth

   9.3 mm

   Weight

   142 g

2. 2. E65

   Height

   105 mm

   Width

   49 mm

   Depth

   15.5 mm

   Weight

   115 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.