BlackBerry Bold Touch 9900 vs Samsung Galaxy mini 2 S6500

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  Galaxy mini 2 S6500: 24.7 g lighter

  Bold Touch 9900:

  130 g

  Galaxy mini 2 S6500:

  105.3 g

• Width

  Galaxy mini 2 S6500: 7.4 mm narrower

  Bold Touch 9900:

  66 mm

  Galaxy mini 2 S6500:

  58.6 mm

• Screen diagonal

  Bold Touch 9900: 0.47 in smaller diagonal

  Bold Touch 9900:

  2.8 in

  Galaxy mini 2 S6500:

  3.27 in

• Depth

  Bold Touch 9900: 1.1 mm thinner

  Bold Touch 9900:

  10.5 mm

  Galaxy mini 2 S6500:

  11.6 mm

• Height

  Galaxy mini 2 S6500: 5.6 mm shorter

  Bold Touch 9900:

  115 mm

  Galaxy mini 2 S6500:

  109.4 mm

• Release year

  Bold Touch 9900:

  2011

  Galaxy mini 2 S6500:

  2012

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Bold Touch 9900

   Height:

   115 mm +5.6 mm versus Galaxy mini 2 S6500

   Width:

   66 mm +7.4 mm versus Galaxy mini 2 S6500

   Depth:

   10.5 mm

2. 2. Galaxy mini 2 S6500

   Height:

   109.4 mm

   Width:

   58.6 mm

   Depth:

   11.6 mm +1.1 mm versus Bold Touch 9900

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Bold Touch 9900

   Screen diagonal:

   2.8 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   24.3 cm²

2. 2. Galaxy mini 2 S6500

   Screen diagonal:

   3.27 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   3:2

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   31.8 cm²

Galaxy mini 2 S6500 has approximately 31.1% more rectangular screen area than Bold Touch 9900.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.