BlackBerry Torch 9800 vs Eten glofiish DX900

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  glofiish DX900: 14 g lighter

  Torch 9800:

  161 g

  glofiish DX900:

  147 g

• Width

  glofiish DX900: 1.5 mm narrower

  Torch 9800:

  62 mm

  glofiish DX900:

  60.5 mm

• Screen diagonal

  glofiish DX900: 0.4 in smaller diagonal

  Torch 9800:

  3.2 in

  glofiish DX900:

  2.8 in

• Depth

  Torch 9800: 2.4 mm thinner

  Torch 9800:

  14.6 mm

  glofiish DX900:

  17 mm

• Height

  glofiish DX900: 5 mm shorter

  Torch 9800:

  111 mm

  glofiish DX900:

  106 mm

• Release year

  Torch 9800:

  2010

  glofiish DX900:

  2008

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Torch 9800

   Height:

   111 mm +5 mm versus glofiish DX900

   Width:

   62 mm +1.5 mm versus glofiish DX900

   Depth:

   14.6 mm

2. 2. glofiish DX900

   Height:

   106 mm

   Width:

   60.5 mm

   Depth:

   17 mm +2.4 mm versus Torch 9800

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Torch 9800

   Screen diagonal:

   3.2 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   31.7 cm²

2. 2. glofiish DX900

   Screen diagonal:

   2.8 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   24.3 cm²

Torch 9800 has approximately 30.6% more rectangular screen area than glofiish DX900.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.