BLU C4 vs Xolo Q900

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightC4: 20 g lighterC4: 118 g · Q900: 138 g
• WidthC4: 5.8 mm narrowerC4: 64.2 mm · Q900: 70 mm
• Screen diagonalC4: 0.7 in smaller diagonalC4: 4 in · Q900: 4.7 in
• DepthQ900: 1 mm thinnerQ900: 9.9 mm · C4: 10.9 mm
• HeightC4: 12.7 mm shorterC4: 124.3 mm · Q900: 137 mm
• Release year2018 / 2013C4: 2018 · Q900: 2013

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. C4

   Height

   124.3 mm

   Width

   64.2 mm

   Depth

   10.9 mm+1 mm versus Q900

   Weight

   118 g

2. 2. Q900

   Height

   137 mm+12.7 mm versus C4

   Width

   70 mm+5.8 mm versus C4

   Depth

   9.9 mm

   Weight

   138 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. C4 4 in · 5:3 About 45.5 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. Q900 4.7 in · 16:9 About 60.9 cm² rectangular area

Q900 has approximately 33.7% more rectangular screen area than C4.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.