BLU C6L vs Nokia 6290

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight6290: 88 g lighter6290: 115 g · C6L: 203 g
• Width6290: 28.6 mm narrower6290: 50 mm · C6L: 78.6 mm
• Screen diagonal6290: 3.3 in smaller diagonal6290: 2.2 in · C6L: 5.5 in
• DepthC6L: 10.4 mm thinnerC6L: 10.4 mm · 6290: 20.8 mm
• Height6290: 60.4 mm shorter6290: 94 mm · C6L: 154.4 mm
• Release year2019 / 2006C6L: 2019 · 6290: 2006

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. C6L

   Height

   154.4 mm+60.4 mm versus 6290

   Width

   78.6 mm+28.6 mm versus 6290

   Depth

   10.4 mm

   Weight

   203 g

2. 2. 6290

   Height

   94 mm

   Width

   50 mm

   Depth

   20.8 mm+10.4 mm versus C6L

   Weight

   115 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. C6L 5.5 in · 16:9 About 83.4 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. 6290 2.2 in · 4:3 About 15 cm² rectangular area

C6L has approximately 456.4% more rectangular screen area than 6290.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.