BLU Dash 3.2 vs Celkon A900

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightDash 3.2: 80 g lighterDash 3.2: 105 g · A900: 185 g
• WidthDash 3.2: 25.7 mm narrowerDash 3.2: 56 mm · A900: 81.7 mm
• Screen diagonalDash 3.2: 1.8 in smaller diagonalDash 3.2: 3.2 in · A900: 5 in
• DepthA900: 2.8 mm thinnerA900: 10.2 mm · Dash 3.2: 13 mm
• HeightDash 3.2: 48.8 mm shorterDash 3.2: 104 mm · A900: 152.8 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Dash 3.2

   Height

   104 mm

   Width

   56 mm

   Depth

   13 mm

   Weight

   105 g

2. 2. A900

   Height

   152.8 mm

   Width

   81.7 mm

   Depth

   10.2 mm

   Weight

   185 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.

Similar comparisons

• M900 vs A900
• A900 vs Honor 30S