BLU Dash 3.2 vs Celkon Win 400

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightDash 3.2: 15.6 g lighterDash 3.2: 105 g · Win 400: 120.6 g
• WidthDash 3.2: 9 mm narrowerDash 3.2: 56 mm · Win 400: 65 mm
• Screen diagonalDash 3.2: 0.8 in smaller diagonalDash 3.2: 3.2 in · Win 400: 4 in
• ChipsetMediatek MT6575 (40 nm) / Qualcomm MSM8212 Snapdragon 200 (28 nm)Dash 3.2: Mediatek MT6575 (40 nm) · Win 400: Qualcomm MSM8212 Snapdragon 200 (28 nm)
• DepthWin 400: 2.7 mm thinnerWin 400: 10.3 mm · Dash 3.2: 13 mm
• HeightDash 3.2: 21.4 mm shorterDash 3.2: 104 mm · Win 400: 125.4 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Dash 3.2

   Height

   104 mm

   Width

   56 mm

   Depth

   13 mm

   Weight

   105 g

2. 2. Win 400

   Height

   125.4 mm

   Width

   65 mm

   Depth

   10.3 mm

   Weight

   120.6 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.