BLU Dash 3.2 vs HTC One E9

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightDash 3.2: 42 g lighterDash 3.2: 105 g · One E9: 147 g
• WidthDash 3.2: 20.5 mm narrowerDash 3.2: 56 mm · One E9: 76.5 mm
• Screen diagonalDash 3.2: 2.3 in smaller diagonalDash 3.2: 3.2 in · One E9: 5.5 in
• ChipsetMediatek MT6575 (40 nm) / Mediatek MT6795M Helio X10 (28 nm)Dash 3.2: Mediatek MT6575 (40 nm) · One E9: Mediatek MT6795M Helio X10 (28 nm)
• DepthOne E9: 5.5 mm thinnerOne E9: 7.5 mm · Dash 3.2: 13 mm
• HeightDash 3.2: 52.5 mm shorterDash 3.2: 104 mm · One E9: 156.5 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Dash 3.2

   Height

   104 mm

   Width

   56 mm

   Depth

   13 mm

   Weight

   105 g

2. 2. One E9

   Height

   156.5 mm

   Width

   76.5 mm

   Depth

   7.5 mm

   Weight

   147 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.