BLU Dash 3.2 vs TECNO Camon CX

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightDash 3.2: 45 g lighterDash 3.2: 105 g · Camon CX: 150 g
• WidthDash 3.2: 19.8 mm narrowerDash 3.2: 56 mm · Camon CX: 75.8 mm
• Screen diagonalDash 3.2: 2.3 in smaller diagonalDash 3.2: 3.2 in · Camon CX: 5.5 in
• ChipsetMediatek MT6575 (40 nm) / Mediatek MT6750T (28 nm)Dash 3.2: Mediatek MT6575 (40 nm) · Camon CX: Mediatek MT6750T (28 nm)
• DepthCamon CX: 7.4 mm thinnerCamon CX: 5.6 mm · Dash 3.2: 13 mm
• HeightDash 3.2: 48.8 mm shorterDash 3.2: 104 mm · Camon CX: 152.8 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Dash 3.2

   Height

   104 mm

   Width

   56 mm

   Depth

   13 mm

   Weight

   105 g

2. 2. Camon CX

   Height

   152.8 mm

   Width

   75.8 mm

   Depth

   5.6 mm

   Weight

   150 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.

Similar comparisons

• Studio C 8+8 LTE vs Camon CX