BLU Dash 3.5 vs Xolo A500

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthDash 3.5: 1.5 mm narrowerDash 3.5: 62 mm · A500: 63.5 mm
• Screen diagonalDash 3.5: 0.5 in smaller diagonalDash 3.5: 3.5 in · A500: 4 in
• HeightDash 3.5: 9 mm shorterDash 3.5: 115 mm · A500: 124 mm
• Release year2012 / 2013Dash 3.5: 2012 · A500: 2013

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Dash 3.5

   Height

   115 mm

   Width

   62 mm

   Depth

   11.5 mm

   Weight

   110 g

2. 2. A500

   Height

   124 mm+9 mm versus Dash 3.5

   Width

   63.5 mm+1.5 mm versus Dash 3.5

   Depth

   11.8 mm

   Weight

   Unknown

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Dash 3.5 3.5 in · 3:2 About 36.5 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. A500 4 in · 5:3 About 45.5 cm² rectangular area

A500 has approximately 24.8% more rectangular screen area than Dash 3.5.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.