BLU Dash G vs Nokia 3.2

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightDash G: 24 g lighterDash G: 157 g · 3.2: 181 g
• WidthDash G: 2.5 mm narrowerDash G: 73.7 mm · 3.2: 76.2 mm
• Screen diagonalDash G: 1.26 in smaller diagonalDash G: 5 in · 3.2: 6.26 in
• ChipsetMediatek MT6580 (28 nm) / Qualcomm SDM429 Snapdragon 429Dash G: Mediatek MT6580 (28 nm) · 3.2: Qualcomm SDM429 Snapdragon 429
• Depth3.2: 1.2 mm thinner3.2: 8.6 mm · Dash G: 9.8 mm
• HeightDash G: 13.1 mm shorterDash G: 146.3 mm · 3.2: 159.4 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Dash G

   Height

   146.3 mm

   Width

   73.7 mm

   Depth

   9.8 mm

   Weight

   157 g

2. 2. 3.2

   Height

   159.4 mm

   Width

   76.2 mm

   Depth

   8.6 mm

   Weight

   181 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.

Similar comparisons

• Redmi 9C vs 3.2