BLU Dash M2 vs ZTE V875

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  ZTE V875 is 46.6 g lighter than BLU Dash M2.

  BLU Dash M2 — Weight: 172 g. ZTE V875 — Weight: 125.4 g.

• Width

  ZTE V875 is 13.4 mm narrower than BLU Dash M2.

  BLU Dash M2 — Width: 73.4 mm. ZTE V875 — Width: 60 mm.

• Screen diagonal

  The screen diagonal of ZTE V875 is 1.8 in smaller than that of BLU Dash M2.

  BLU Dash M2 — Screen diagonal: 5 in. ZTE V875 — Screen diagonal: 3.2 in.

• Depth

  BLU Dash M2 is 1.5 mm thinner than ZTE V875.

  BLU Dash M2 — Depth: 9.8 mm. ZTE V875 — Depth: 11.3 mm.

• Height

  ZTE V875 is 23 mm shorter than BLU Dash M2.

  BLU Dash M2 — Height: 145 mm. ZTE V875 — Height: 122 mm.

• Release year

  The recorded release year for BLU Dash M2 is 2016. The recorded release year for ZTE V875 is 2012.

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. BLU Dash M2

   Height:

   145 mm +23 mm versus ZTE V875

   Width:

   73.4 mm +13.4 mm versus ZTE V875

   Depth:

   9.8 mm

   Weight:

   172 g

2. 2. ZTE V875

   Height:

   122 mm

   Width:

   60 mm

   Depth:

   11.3 mm +1.5 mm versus BLU Dash M2

   Weight:

   125.4 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. BLU Dash M2

   Screen diagonal:

   5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   68.9 cm²

2. 2. ZTE V875

   Screen diagonal:

   3.2 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   31.7 cm²

BLU Dash M2 has approximately 117.3% more rectangular screen area than ZTE V875.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.