BLU Grand Mini vs Lava A68

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Depth

  Grand Mini: 1 mm thinner

  Grand Mini:

  8.6 mm

  A68:

  9.6 mm

• Height

  Grand Mini: 2 mm shorter

  Grand Mini:

  132 mm

  A68:

  134 mm

• Release year

  Grand Mini:

  2017

  A68:

  2016

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Grand Mini

   Height:

   132 mm

   Width:

   66 mm

   Depth:

   8.6 mm

2. 2. A68

   Height:

   134 mm +2 mm versus Grand Mini

   Width:

   66 mm

   Depth:

   9.6 mm +1 mm versus Grand Mini

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Grand Mini

   Screen diagonal:

   4.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   55.8 cm²

2. 2. A68

   Screen diagonal:

   4.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   55.8 cm²

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.