BLU Magic vs Xiaomi Mi CC9

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthMagic: 16.5 mm narrowerMagic: 58 mm · Mi CC9: 74.5 mm
• Screen diagonalMagic: 3.19 in smaller diagonalMagic: 3.2 in · Mi CC9: 6.39 in
• ChipsetQualcomm MSM7227 Snapdragon S1 / Qualcomm SDM710 Snapdragon 710 (10 nm)Magic: Qualcomm MSM7227 Snapdragon S1 · Mi CC9: Qualcomm SDM710 Snapdragon 710 (10 nm)
• Rear camera layoutSingle / TripleMagic: Single · Mi CC9: Triple
• DepthMi CC9: 4.8 mm thinnerMi CC9: 8.7 mm · Magic: 13.5 mm
• HeightMagic: 45.8 mm shorterMagic: 111 mm · Mi CC9: 156.8 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Magic

   Height

   111 mm

   Width

   58 mm

   Depth

   13.5 mm

   Weight

   Unknown

2. 2. Mi CC9

   Height

   156.8 mm

   Width

   74.5 mm

   Depth

   8.7 mm

   Weight

   179 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.