BLU Neo XL vs Nokia E90

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightNeo XL: 27 g lighterNeo XL: 183 g · E90: 210 g
• WidthE90: 27.5 mm narrowerE90: 57 mm · Neo XL: 84.5 mm
• Screen diagonalE90: 2 in smaller diagonalE90: 4 in · Neo XL: 6 in
• DepthNeo XL: 11.5 mm thinnerNeo XL: 8.5 mm · E90: 20 mm
• HeightE90: 30 mm shorterE90: 132 mm · Neo XL: 162 mm
• Release year2016 / 2007Neo XL: 2016 · E90: 2007

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Neo XL

   Height

   162 mm+30 mm versus E90

   Width

   84.5 mm+27.5 mm versus E90

   Depth

   8.5 mm

   Weight

   183 g

2. 2. E90

   Height

   132 mm

   Width

   57 mm

   Depth

   20 mm+11.5 mm versus Neo XL

   Weight

   210 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

At least two phones need compatible screen dimensions for a drawing.

1. 1. Neo XL 6 in · 16:9 About 99.2 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. E90 Screen geometry unavailable or conflicting

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.