BLU Studio 5.0 E vs Samsung Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310: 73.5 g lighter

  Studio 5.0 E:

  174 g

  Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310:

  100.5 g

• Width

  Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310: 16.2 mm narrower

  Studio 5.0 E:

  74 mm

  Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310:

  57.8 mm

• Screen diagonal

  Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310: 2 in smaller diagonal

  Studio 5.0 E:

  5 in

  Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310:

  3 in

• Depth

  Studio 5.0 E: 1.7 mm thinner

  Studio 5.0 E:

  10.1 mm

  Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310:

  11.8 mm

• Height

  Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310: 41 mm shorter

  Studio 5.0 E:

  146 mm

  Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310:

  105 mm

• Release year

  Studio 5.0 E:

  2014

  Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310:

  2013

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Studio 5.0 E

   Height:

   146 mm +41 mm versus Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310

   Width:

   74 mm +16.2 mm versus Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310

   Depth:

   10.1 mm

2. 2. Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310

   Height:

   105 mm

   Width:

   57.8 mm

   Depth:

   11.8 mm +1.7 mm versus Studio 5.0 E

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Studio 5.0 E

   Screen diagonal:

   5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   68.9 cm²

2. 2. Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310

   Screen diagonal:

   3 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   27.9 cm²

Studio 5.0 E has approximately 147.3% more rectangular screen area than Galaxy Pocket Neo S5310.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.