BLU Studio 5.0 E vs Xolo Q900T

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthQ900T: 6.4 mm narrowerQ900T: 67.6 mm · Studio 5.0 E: 74 mm
• Screen diagonalQ900T: 0.3 in smaller diagonalQ900T: 4.7 in · Studio 5.0 E: 5 in
• DepthQ900T: 0.8 mm thinnerQ900T: 9.3 mm · Studio 5.0 E: 10.1 mm
• HeightQ900T: 12.2 mm shorterQ900T: 133.8 mm · Studio 5.0 E: 146 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Studio 5.0 E

   Height

   146 mm+12.2 mm versus Q900T

   Width

   74 mm+6.4 mm versus Q900T

   Depth

   10.1 mm+0.8 mm versus Q900T

   Weight

   174 g

2. 2. Q900T

   Height

   133.8 mm

   Width

   67.6 mm

   Depth

   9.3 mm

   Weight

   Unknown

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Studio 5.0 E 5 in · 16:9 About 68.9 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. Q900T 4.7 in · 16:9 About 60.9 cm² rectangular area

Studio 5.0 E has approximately 13.2% more rectangular screen area than Q900T.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.