BLU Studio C Mini vs Panasonic P66

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Screen diagonalStudio C Mini: 0.3 in smaller diagonalStudio C Mini: 4.7 in · P66: 5 in
• DepthP66: 1.1 mm thinnerP66: 8.4 mm · Studio C Mini: 9.5 mm
• HeightStudio C Mini: 4.4 mm shorterStudio C Mini: 138 mm · P66: 142.4 mm
• Release year2014 / 2016Studio C Mini: 2014 · P66: 2016

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Studio C Mini

   Height

   138 mm

   Width

   71.5 mm

   Depth

   9.5 mm+1.1 mm versus P66

   Weight

   156 g

2. 2. P66

   Height

   142.4 mm+4.4 mm versus Studio C Mini

   Width

   70.9 mm

   Depth

   8.4 mm

   Weight

   155 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Studio C Mini 4.7 in · 5:3 About 62.9 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. P66 5 in · 16:9 About 68.9 cm² rectangular area

P66 has approximately 9.6% more rectangular screen area than Studio C Mini.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.